Neighbourhood Diepenhoek

Neighbourhood in district Buitengebied Someren-Eind · municipality Someren · Noord-Brabant

  • 36 homes
  • 110 inhabitants
  • avg. year of construction 1966
  • avg. WOZ € 538.000

Boundary according to the CBS district and neighbourhood map 2024. Zoom in for individual homes; click a home for details. Open in the properties map

Homes in Diepenhoek

Homes
36
addresses with residential function (BAG)
Average build year
1966
Average living area
281 m²
Housing stock (CBS)
43
2025

Home type

  • Detached 94% 34
  • Semi-detached house 6% 2

Energy label

  • A or better 6% 2
  • B 11% 4
  • C 17% 6
  • D 14% 5
  • E 6% 2
  • F 19% 7
  • G 19% 7
  • No label 8% 3

Building period

  • Built before 1945 22% 8
  • 1945–1969 31% 11
  • 1970–1989 22% 8
  • 1990–2009 14% 5
  • 2010 and later 11% 4

Residents

Residents
110
January 1, 2025
Households
50
avg. 2,2 people
One-person households
30%
Households with children
30%
Population density
27
inhabitants per km²
Area
4,0 km²

Age distribution

  • 0–15 years 13% 15
  • 15–25 years 13% 15
  • 25–45 years 17% 20
  • 45–65 years 39% 45
  • 65 years and older 17% 20

Housing and value

Average WOZ value
€ 538.000
CBS 2024
Owner-occupied homes
77%
Rental homes
23%
0% housing association
Single-family homes
100%
0% multi-family
Built in the last 10 years
7%
Unoccupied properties
5%
New build in the year
0
delivered homes

The WOZ value is the average of all homes in the area (valuation date January 1 of the previous year), not the market value of a specific property.

Energy

Avg. electricity consumption
4.500 kWh
per dwelling per year
Avg. feed-in
3.520 kWh
solar power per home
Avg. gas consumption
1.500 m³
per dwelling per year

Consumption is the average of all homes with a connection in the area (CBS); the label distribution is shown under "Woningen".

Amenities and accessibility

Large supermarket
6,1 km
avg. distance
General practice
3,2 km
avg. distance
Primary school
2,9 km
avg. distance
Daycare
3,2 km
avg. distance
Schools within 3 km
0
Urbanity
Non-urban
19 addresses per km²
Company locations
35
of which 5 retail and hospitality

Road distances, averaged for all residents of the area (CBS).

Living environment: noise, water, air, light and green

Average noise level (Lden)
47 dB
municipality 49 dB
Homes with road traffic above 55 dB
6%
municipality 17%
Homes with rail traffic above 55 dB
0%
Homes with air traffic above 48 dB
0%
municipality 0%
Homes with wind turbine noise above 40 dB
0%
's nachts wegverkeer boven 50 dB
0%
municipality 6%

Noise level of the 36 homes

  • up to 45 dB: very quiet 44% 16
  • 46–50 dB: quiet 11% 4
  • 51–55 dB: moderately 44% 16

Flooding

Homes that may flood
31%
municipality 1%
Of which more than 0.5 m water
0%
Of which more than 2 m water
0%
Maximum water depth
0,4 m
average 0,1 m where it floods

Air, light and green

NO₂
9,3 µg/m³
11% above WHO advice (10)
PM2,5
8,4 µg/m³
100% above WHO recommendation (5)
PM10
15,4 µg/m³
58% above WHO advice (15)
Night lighting
Dark
municipality: dimmed
Green within 500 m
87%
municipality 53%

Noise: RIVM noise maps (road and rail 2020, aviation 2022, wind turbines 2024), annual average Lden per 10 m, sampled at each address. Flooding: LIWO (Rijkswaterstaat), map of maximum water depth; depth says nothing about probability. Air: RIVM annual average concentrations at 25 m. Light: RIVM light emission map 2023. Green: RIVM green map 2022, share of green within 500 m. Turn the noise map on in the map above.

Climate and safety

Apparent temperature on a hot day
45 °C
extreme heat stress
Homes with extreme heat stress (41 °C or higher)
86%
municipality 94%
Urban heat island effect
0–0,2 °C
on average warmer than the surrounding area
Homes with a cool spot within 300 m
50%
municipality 69%
Homes with moderate or high flood risk
0%
municipality 0%
Homes with increased risk of groundwater nuisance in 2050
8%
municipality 95%
Homes with a stormwater channel alongside the house
14%
municipality 9%
Homes in the magnetic field zone of a high-voltage line
0%
municipality 0%
Homes within 1 km of a wind turbine
0%
municipality 0%

Climate Impact Atlas 2026 (CC BY 4.0): perceived temperature and heat island 2022, cool spots, location-specific flood probability (at least 20 cm water), dry floors, risk of groundwater nuisance 2050 (high scenario), flow paths at 70 mm precipitation per hour; sampled per dwelling. High-voltage lines: RIVM Netkaart with calculation distances. Wind turbines: RIVM. Turn on the heat map on the map above.

Liveability

Very good Liveability meter 2024

very insufficientexcellent

Liveability
Very good
class 8 of 9, measurement 2024
Score
4,20
+0,09 vs. the national average
Since the previous measurement
+0,01
measurement 2022: Good
Municipality
Good
score 4,16

Five dimensions, deviation from the national average

  • Physical environment green, water, buildings, noise −0,01 sufficient
  • Housing stock type, construction year, ownership +0,10 good
  • Amenities shops, schools, healthcare, public transport −0,20 more than insufficient
  • Social cohesion population composition, relocations +0,09 good
  • Nuisance and insecurity crime and nuisance +0,12 good

Source: Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, CC0), biennial estimate based on over a hundred characteristics; the score expresses how residents rate livability on average. Negative = below the national average.

Soil and foundation

Expected decrease until 2050
0 cm
high scenario
Homes at risk of pile rot
0,0%
zeer laag, municipality 0,0%
Pile rot in 2050
0,0%
high scenario, drier summers
Difference projection in 2050
1,0%
houses on pile with risk

Source: Klimaateffectatlas 2026 (CC BY 4.0): subsidence from satellite measurements (Bodemdalingskaart), foundation risk per neighbourhood (Deltares/KCAF, share of homes with wooden piles or on slab at risk). A neighbourhood average, not a statement about a single property.